Your Obligation to Bare Arms - Part I: The Founders Expected Us to be Competent.

If the Second Amendment is a right, then responsibility is the price of admission. Owning firearms without learning safe handling, storage, and marksmanship isn’t “freedom,” it’s negligence. The founders expected citizens to be both armed and competent. That standard still applies to this day.

What the founders actually said

James Madison spelled it out in Federalist No. 46: a free people, attached to their local governments and accustomed to arms, are a powerful check on overreach. He contrasted a small standing army with “a militia amounting to near half a million of citizens with arms in their hands” and noted “the advantage of being armed, which the Americans possess over the people of almost every other nation.”

Alexander Hamilton, writing in Federalist No. 29, argued that militias must be organized and trained well enough to be effective. Translation: the system only works if citizens actually know how to use their arms safely and competently.

The text that binds it all is spare and blunt: “the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.” Whatever modern debates swirl around it, that line is part of the Bill of Rights for a reason.

How modern courts read the right

In 2008 the Supreme Court held that the Second Amendment protects an individual right to keep a handgun in the home for self-defense. In 2022, the Court affirmed that ordinary citizens have a right to carry handguns in public for self-defense, using a text-and-history standard to judge restrictions. None of this negates longstanding limits on dangerous people or unusual weapons, but it does confirm that the right belongs to the people, not just to a government-managed select militia.

Rights come bundled with responsibilities

A competent citizen is a safer citizen. That means:

• learn and live the universal safety rules,

• secure firearms from unauthorized access,

• and practice enough to make “safe” a habit, not a hope.

If you need a starting point, NSSF’s 10 Rules of Firearm Safety and Project ChildSafe’s lock-and-learn materials are straightforward, practical, and free. The NRA’s safety rules cover the same fundamentals in plain language. These programs aren’t about politics; they’re about the habits that prevent tragedies at home and on the range.

If you’re the data-driven type: CDC injury surveillance shows hundreds of unintentional firearm deaths each year, most often in homes. Training and secure storage aren’t optional extras; they’re the difference between a constitutional right and a preventable headline.

Why a trained citizenry checks government power

The founders weren’t subtle: they distrusted concentrated power. Madison’s point in Federalist No. 46 was not that citizens should fantasize about conflict, but that a broad, trained, and locally rooted citizenry makes abuse less likely in the first place. That deterrent only exists if ordinary people remain familiar with arms and capable of safe, lawful use.

What happens when nations revoke or hollow out civilian arms

History isn’t a single case study, but the pattern is instructive:

• Great Britain (1997): Parliament effectively banned private possession of most handguns after Dunblane. Whatever one thinks of the policy, it turned a previously lawful class of arms into prohibited weapons almost overnight.

• Australia (1996): After Port Arthur, the National Firearms Agreement banned certain long guns and launched a sweeping compulsory buyback, removing hundreds of thousands of firearms from civilians. The point here isn’t to litigate outcomes, only to note how fast broad classes of ordinary arms can be reclassified and seized when gun ownership is treated as a revocable privilege.

• Nazi Germany (1938): Following years of registry and licensing, the regime issued regulations after Kristallnacht that barred Jews from possessing weapons at all. The Weimar-era framework made targeted disarmament easier. Historical specifics matter, but the lesson is clear: when the state knows who has what, targeted confiscation is a policy choice away.

Different countries, different goals, same mechanism: reduce lawful civilian access and competence, and the citizen’s leverage over the state shrinks.

The Swiss comparison: armed, trained, and expected to act like adults

The United States isn’t Switzerland, but the Swiss model shows how civic expectations sustain both safety and freedom. Switzerland maintains a militia army with compulsory service for most men. Conscripts keep personal service rifles at home during service, train regularly, and may purchase their rifle after service. The militia structure and marksmanship culture remain strong among the Swiss, and they maintain some of the world's most impressive civilian shooting ranges (many to the envy of those we have here in the States). The Swiss are known for their long range shooting skills. Civilian carry is regulated, yet broad familiarity with safe handling and 300-meter ranges is normal. In short: high proficiency, clear rules, cultural buy-in.

Our deal, stated plainly

The American deal is different from most of the world’s: here, the people are presumed trustworthy, and the government carries the burden of justification. The Second Amendment codifies that. But the right only keeps its legitimacy if we meet the duty that comes with it: train, store responsibly, and model safe, competent use for the next generation.

So yes, support the Second Amendment. Then actually earn it. Take a certified class, lock up your firearms, and put in the reps until safe gun handling is second nature. That’s how we keep both halves of the founders’ vision: citizens with the right to keep and bear arms, and a country safer because those citizens choose the responsibility to use them well.

If you enjoyed this article, be sure to leave us a comment. Also, follow us on our social media accounts... and don't forget to visit our shop online at:  www.ascensionarmory.net

References

• Founders & text: Federalist No. 46 (Madison); Federalist No. 29 (Hamilton); U.S. Bill of Rights (text, National Archives; Library of Congress). Congress.gov+3Avalon Project+3Avalon Project+3

• Supreme Court: District of Columbia v. Heller, 554 U.S. 570 (2008); N.Y. State Rifle & Pistol Ass’n v. Bruen, 142 S. Ct. 2111 (2022). Library of Congress Tiles+1

• Safety & training: NSSF 10 Rules; Project ChildSafe resources; NRA gun safety rules; CDC firearm injury fast facts and MMWR on unintentional deaths. CDC+4NSSF+4Project Childsafe+4

• Comparative law: UK Firearms (Amendment) Act 1997; Australia’s 1996 National Firearms Agreement and government summaries. Legislation.gov.uk+2ACI Commission+2

• Switzerland: Swiss militia service overview and weapons law; swissinfo reporting on home storage and ammo policy. SWI swissinfo.ch+3Ch.ch+3Ch.ch+3

• Historical note: Law Library of Congress on German gun control; scholarly translations discussing the 1938 “Regulation Against Jews’ Possession of Weapons.” Library of Congress Tiles+1